Nuclear Weapons, AUKUS + Health
MAPW VP Dr Amanda Ruler writes for the ANMJ.
MAPW VP Dr Amanda Ruler writes for the ANMJ.
The government's proposed regulatory arrangements for naval nuclear reactors are just another reason to ditch this dangerous plan.
Twenty years on, the invading nations behave as if the war on Iraq never happened.
It is only by ignoring the costs of war that preparations for the next one can be announced with such triumphalism and pride.
Naval NuclearReactors Naval nuclear power is a proliferation risk, will cause regional instability, and is incompatible with public opposition to nuclear power. High Risk, High Cost The Australian Government will acquire naval nuclear capability, without consultation with parliament or the…
AUKUS We work with our partners to oppose the AUKUS agreement. AUKUS: threat to peace and security No scrutiny, no debate. The AUKUS arrangement has not been scrutinised by parliament or the Australian people. The full implications for Australian security…
MAPW has released an updated briefing on key safety questions releated to naval nuclear reactors.
In a submission to the Inquiry into the Removing Nuclear Energy Prohibitions Bill 2022, MAPW provides evidence for the preservation of prohibitions on nuclear energy.
The plans for six US long-range nuclear weapons-capable B-52 bombers to be hosted in northern Australia, as disclosed by ABC Four Corners on 31 October, represent a grave undermining of our security. Australia is marching headlong into yet another disastrous…